Primary Financial Statements,
Financial Reporting for Commercial and Industrial Enterprises, International
Accounting Standards (IAS) GAAP, 2002-04-20 (Working Draft)
Explanatory Notes
Status: |
Working Draft, issued in accordance with XBRL International Processes REC 2002-04-20. |
Issued: |
2002-04-20 (20 April, 2002) |
Name: |
Primary Financial Statements (PFS), Financial Reporting for Commercial and Industrial Enterprises, International Accounting Standards (IAS) |
Description: |
This taxonomy is intended to allow traded entities to prepare XBRL-based interim and annual financial statements according to IAS. This includes consolidated publicly listed enterprises, parent enterprise financial statements, and nonconsolidated enterprises. |
Namespace identifier: |
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20 |
Recommended namespace prefix: |
iascf-pfs |
Version of XBRL Specification Used: |
XBRL Specification 2.0 dated 2001-12-14 |
Relation to Other XBRL Taxonomies: |
This taxonomy does not reference any other XBRL taxonomies. This taxonomy is intended to be referenced by the IASCF Explanatory Disclosures and Accounting Policies (EDAP) Taxonomy which has additional financial concepts commonly found in the notes to the financial statements, management commentary, accounting policies, and auditor’s report. |
Physical Location of Taxonomy Package: |
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.xsd (Schema) http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-references.xml (References linkbase) http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-labels.xml (Labels linkbase) http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-presentation.xml (Presentation linkbase) http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-calculation.xml (Calculation linkbase) http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-definition.xml (Definition linkbase) |
Roger Debreceny FCPA, CMA, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Charles Hoffman CPA, Universal Business Matrix, United States.
Josef Macdonald CA, Ernst and Young, New Zealand.
Roger Debreceny FCPA, CMA, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Thomas Egan CPA, Deloitte and Touche, Singapore.
Charles Hoffman CPA, Universal Business Matrix, United States.
Dave Garbutt CA, FRS, South Africa.
David Huxtable CPA, KPMG, Australia.
David Prather, IASC Foundation, UK.
Geoff Shuetrim, KPMG, Australia.
Josef Macdonald CA, Ernst and Young, New Zealand.
Julie Santoro CA, KPMG, UK.
Bruno Tesniere, CPA, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Belgium.
Paul Phenix, Australian Stock Exchange, Australia.
David Prather, IASC Foundation, UK.
Josef Macdonald CA, Ernst & Young, New Zealand.
Kok-Kwai Tang CPA, Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Singapore, Singapore.
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.htm (XHTML Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.pdf (PDF Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.doc (Word Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.pdf (PDF Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.xls (Excel Format)
© 2002 ® All Rights Reserved. XBRL International liability, , and rules apply.
These Explanatory Notes describe the eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) International Accounting Standards Taxonomy: Primary Financial Statements (PFS), Financial Reporting for Commercial and Industrial Companies, International Accounting Standards GAAP – Primary Financial Statements (“the PFS Taxonomy”). The PFS Taxonomy has been prepared by the IASC Foundation and the IAS Working Group of XBRL International.
This PFS Taxonomy is compliant with XBRL Specification Version 2.0, dated 2001-12-14 (http://www.xbrl.org/tr/2001/). It is for the creation of XML-based instance documents that generate business and financial reporting for Commercial and Industrial companies according to the International Accounting Standards Boards’ International Accounting Standards GAAP (http://www.iasb.org.uk).
This document assumes a general understanding of accounting and XBRL. If the reader desires additional information relating to XBRL, the XBRL International web site (http://www.xbrl.org) is recommended. In particular a reading of the XBRL Specification Version 2.0 is highly recommended (http://www.xbrl.org/tr/2001/).
The terminology used in this document frequently overlaps with terminology from other disciplines. The following definitions are provided to explain the use of terms within the XBRL knowledge domain.
Taxonomy |
An XBRL Taxonomy is an XML Schema-compliant .xsd file that contains XBRL elements, which are XML elements that are defined by XBRL-specific attributes. An XBRL Taxonomy may also contain references to xLink linkbases. |
Instance document |
An XML document that includes on or more XBRL elements and optional references to zero or more xLink linkbases. |
Element |
An XBRL element, is a “fact” or piece of information described by an XBRL taxonomy. For example, an element with the name “cfl.cdm” is the IASCF taxonomy’s XBRL element name for the financial statement disclosure fact “cash flow reconciliation for operating activities, direct method.” |
Linkbase |
Linkbases provide additional information about XBRL elements, in particular, relationships between them such as the relationship that “Property, Plant and Equipment” is defined as an “Asset.” Linkbases used by XBRL are compliant with the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) XLink Recommendation 1.0. |
1.4. Relationship to Other Work
2.3. Element Naming Convention
2.7. Further Documentation Available
3. Items to Note in Using the Taxonomy
3.2. How to Interpret the Taxonomy Structure
3.4. Income Statement Structure
3.6. Statement of Changes in Equity Structure
3.10. Entering Numeric Values into Instance Documents
4.3. Concepts and Considerations
Composite Element Names are not Hierarchical in Nature
5. Review and Testing, Updates and Changes
5.3. Errors and Clarifications
The International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation (IASC Foundation) and XBRL International (http://www.xbrl.org) are leading the development of this eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) Primary Financial Statements (PFS) Taxonomy for the purpose of expressing financial statements according to the International Accounting Standards Board’s International Accounting Standards (IAS) and forthcoming International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) (http://www.iasb.org.uk) .
This Primary Financial Statements (PFS) Taxonomy is designed to facilitate the creation of XBRL instance documents that reflect business and financial reporting for Commercial and Industrial companies according to the International Accounting Standards Board’s (http://www.iasb.org.uk) IAS Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The purpose of the PFS Taxonomy is to provide a framework for the consistent creation of XBRL documents for financial reporting purposes by private sector and certain public sector entities. The purpose of this and other taxonomies produced using XBRL is to supply a framework that will facilitate data exchange among software applications used by companies and individuals as well as other financial information stakeholders, such as lenders, investors, auditors, attorneys, and regulators.
The authority for this PFS Taxonomy is based upon the International Accounting Standards Board’s (http://www.iasb.org.uk) International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) and Statements of Interpretation (“SIC”) effective 01 January 2002 (http://www.iasplus.com/standard/standard.htm) and from best practice. As this Taxonomy primarily addresses the reporting considerations of Commercial and Industrial companies, IAS 26 and IAS 30 disclosure requirements are not represented in the Taxonomy’s content.
The particular disclosures in this PFS Taxonomy models are:
1. Required by particular IASs
2. Typically represented in IAS model financial statements, checklists and guidance materials as provided from each of the major international accounting firms.
3. Found in common reporting practice, or
4. Flow logically from items 1-3, for example, sub-totals and totals.
This PFS Taxonomy is in compliance with XBRL Specification Version 2.0, dated 2001-12-14 (http://www.xbrl.org/tr/2001/).
The Taxonomy is a Working Draft. Its content and structure have been reviewed both accounting and technical teams of the IASCF(http://www.iascf.com) and the IAS Taxonomy Development Working Group. As such, the XBRL element names, labels, linkbases and references should be considered complete and stable within the domain of the Taxonomy. Although changes may occur to any of this XBRL data, the probability of any changes significantly altering the content of the Taxonomy is low.
The following is a summary of meanings of the status of taxonomies:
This Primary Financial Statements (PFS) Taxonomy is released in tandem with the XBRL Global Common Document (GCD) Taxonomy and the Explanatory Disclosures and Accounting Policies (EDAP) Taxonomy. The GCD Taxonomy incorporates elements that are common to the great majority of XBRL instance documents, regardless of type. The GCD Taxonomy has elements that describe the XBRL instance document itself and the entity to which the instance document relates. The PFS Taxonomy encompasses the core financial statements that private sector and certain public sector entities report typically in annual, semi-annual or quarterly financial disclosures.
Those financial statements are the
Reporting elements from those financial statements may be incorporated into a wide variety of other disclosures from press releases to multi-period summaries.
The EDAP Taxonomy has elements that provide enhanced disclosure over and above the disclosures made in the primary financial statements. These disclosures are, in the context of annual financial statements, typically made in the notes to the financial statements. The EDAP taxonomy also provides elements to identify the accounting policies adopted by the reporting entity. Elements in the EDAP taxonomy include:
Taken together, these three taxonomies will meet the reporting needs of companies that meet three criteria, viz (i) they reporting under International Accounting Standards (IASs), (ii) are in the broad category of “commercial and industrial” industries and (iii) have relatively common reporting elements in their financial statements. In practice, these three criteria are unlikely to hold for any company. Additional taxonomies are likely to be required. These taxonomies are likely to identify the particular needs of:
These extension taxonomies will either extend the GCD, PFS and EDAP taxonomies to meet the particular reporting requirements of that industry, country or company and/or restrict the use of particular by limiting the use of particular PFS or EDAP taxonomy elements.
The inter-relationships of the various taxonomies are show in Figure 1:
Figure 1: Interrelationship of Taxonomies and Instance Document
At the date of release of this document no other taxonomy had been formally released, but extension taxonomies are under development for the Australian national jurisdiction.
XBRL utilizes the World Wide Web consortium (W3C www.w3.org ) recommendations, specifically:
The following is an overview of the taxonomy. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with financial and business reporting and has a basic understanding of XBRL.
This PFS Taxonomy makes available to users the most commonly disclosed financial information under the IASB’s IAS Standards. This taxonomy is an expression of financial information in terms that are understandable to humans, but more importantly also understandable by a computer application.
The PFS Taxonomy is made up of a “package” of interrelated XML files:
The package is represented visually; with an example based on Balance Sheet reporting of Non-Current Investment Property is shown in Figure 2:
Figure 2: PFS Taxonomy Package and Example
The PFS Taxonomy contains nearly four hundred elements or unique, individually identified pieces of information. The XML schema file at the heart of the taxonomy package provides a straightforward listing of the elements in the taxonomy. The linkbases provide the other information necessary to interpret (e.g. Label and Definition linkbases) taxonomy elements or place a given taxonomy element in context of other taxonomy elements (e.g. Calculation and Presentation linkbases).
Given that information on the Taxonomy is included in XML schema and linkbase files, it is best rendered for human interpretation in a “paper” paradigm. Users are encouraged to review versions of the taxonomy elements in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) (http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.pdf) or Excel http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.xls formats.
However, in this rendering much of the characteristics of taxonomy are not obvious. The paper paradigm is two dimensional, whereas the information in the taxonomy is multidimensional. The application of a metaphor assists in understanding taxonomies. The PFS Taxonomy is organized using a “Balance Sheet” metaphor. This organization is used because it is understood by most accountants who use this metaphor to organize their audit working papers; to put the notes to the financial statements in order and in a variety of other uses. This metaphor is also familiar to the users of financial statements.
However, this metaphor and organization somewhat limits an understanding of the power behind an XBRL taxonomy. A taxonomy has multiple “dimensions”. Relationships can be expressed in terms of definitions, calculations, links to labels in one or more languages, links to one or more references, etc. The metaphor used expresses only one such relationship.
The PFS Taxonomy is divided logically into sections that correspond to typical financial statement components. While there is no true concept of “sections” in the Taxonomy, their purpose is to group similar concepts together and facilitate navigation within the Taxonomy. The following is a listing of “sections” and a brief explanation (where necessary) of those sections:
The higher-level sections of the Taxonomy are shown in Figure 3:
Figure 3: High Level Sections of PFS Taxonomy
Section |
Explanatory Guidance |
Balance Sheet |
See Section 3.3 for additional details |
Income Statement |
See Section 3.4 for additional details |
Statement of Cash Flows |
See Section 3.5 for additional details |
Statement of Changes in Equity |
See Section 3.6 for additional details |
XBRL naming conventions follows that of XML Schema. Each name within a taxonomy must be unique and must start with an alpha character or the underscore character. Element names are case-sensitive so “different”, “Different” and “DIFFERENT” can all exist within the same taxonomy because they are considered unique. The PFS Taxonomy naming convention follows these rules. In particular, element names should not be interpreted as containing a “hierarchical” structure or as indicating relationships with other elements. Taxonomy structure is expressed in the XBRL linkbases.
A PFS Taxonomy XBRL “element name” is called a composite element name. A composite element is comprised of IASC Foundation “components”. Each component represents an IAS concept, definition or best practice, etc. Each component is three characters in length and each three-character component is cross referenced (in a separate file) with the concept it represents. Combining multiple components yields a composite element name. For example, “ast” and “inv” abbreviate, in English, “asset” and “inventory” respectively. Combining the two components produces the composite element “ast.inv”. For further details of the naming convention, see Section 4 - Naming Convention and the Appendix.
Currently, labels for taxonomy elements are provided in English. In the future, taxonomy labels will be expressed in additional languages.
This Taxonomy provides references to IAS standards. Figure 4 shows the reference elements are used in this taxonomy, using “IAS 1, para 5.6(i)” to illustrate how a reference is matched to these elements:
Figure 4: Reference Naming Structure
Name: |
IAS |
Number: |
1 |
Paragraph: |
5 |
Subparagraph: |
6 |
Clause: |
i |
Many elements use the XML Schema Documentation fields to provide additional information that users may find useful, including the following four descriptors that identify the element and its position in the taxonomy:
The intent of this document is to explain the Taxonomy. This document assumes a general understanding of accounting and XBRL. If the reader desires additional information relating to XBRL, the XBRL International web site (http://www.xbrl.org) is recommended. Specifically, a reading of the XBRL Specification Version 2.0 is highly recommended (http://www.xbrl.org/tr/2001/). The purpose of this document is to explain how XBRL is being applied in this specific case, for this taxonomy.
The following documentation is available to assist those wishing to understand and use this taxonomy. This documentation is available on the XBRL International web site (http://www.xbrl.org):
This overview document describing objectives of the IASC Foundation, XBRL International IAS Working Party and the Taxonomy:
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.htm (XHTML Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.pdf (PDF Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.doc (Word Format)
This is a summary listing of taxonomy elements in a human readable format for the purpose of obtaining an overview of this taxonomy.
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.pdf (PDF Format)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.xls (Excel Format)
These documents correspond to a set of interrelated files comprising an XBRL taxonomy package:
These files are located as follows:
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.xsd (Schema)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-references.xml (References linkbase)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-labels.xml (Labels linkbase)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-presentation.xml (Presentation linkbase)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-calculation.xml (Calculation linkbase)
http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-definition.xml (Definition linkbase)
The following explanation of the taxonomy, the taxonomies with which this PFS Taxonomy is designed to interoperate, and examples of how to interpret the PFS Taxonomy are provided to make the PFS Taxonomy easier to use. Please refer to the detailed printout of the PFS Taxonomy as you go through this explanation (http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/international/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20-elements.pdf). This explanatory document is designed to provide an overview of the PFS Taxonomy to be a brief and concise overview. We expect that the XBRL community will create courses, books and other materials to provide a through explanation of every aspect of using the PFS Taxonomy and other cognate taxonomies.
The element fragment shown in Figure 5 exists within the Taxonomy:
Figure 5: Element Fragment
ast.ncr.net |
Non Current Assets |
ast.ncr.ppe |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
ast.ncr.ivp |
Investment Property |
ast.ncr.int |
Intangible Assets |
This means that for a commercial and industrial company, there is a type of non-current asset called “Property Plant and Equipment”. This is represented by the element with this label, and a composite name of “ ast.ncr.ppe”.
If a company reports their financials using an XBRL-compliant electronic instance document then one of the following will be true:
· All of the entities “Cash, Cash Equivalents or Short Term Investments” must be recorded within one of the elements already included in the taxonomy as a child to this element, OR
· The electronic document will include an extension to the taxonomy that consists of a new element or elements and an indication of how the new element rolls up to “Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short Term Investments”.
All of the elements in the fragment provided are of a data type “monetary” with a weight of “1”. Having a weight of “1” indicates that the element value of all children of an element, multiplied by the weight, then add up or “roll up” to the value of the parent element. For example, “Cash Equivalents” and “Cash” total to make up the value of “Cash and Cash Equivalents”. This continues up the Calculation linkbase tree so that “Assets” has a value of the children “Current Assets” and “Noncurrent Assets”, and so forth throughout the entire taxonomy.
The major sections of the Balance Sheet structure are shown in Figure 6:
Figure 6: Balance Sheet Structure
Element Names |
Structural Elements |
bst |
Balance Sheet |
ast.net |
Assets |
ast.ncr.net |
Non Current Assets |
ast.cur.net |
Current Assets |
lia.eqy |
Liabilities and Equity |
eqy.net |
Equity |
lia.net |
Liabilities |
lia.ncr.net |
Non Current Liabilities |
lia.cur.net |
Current Liabilities |
The structure of the Income Statement and Cash Flows statement (see Section 3.5), and other structures, may not appear intuitive at first glance. The structure of the Income Statement is shown in Figure 7:
Figure 7: Income Statement – Major Structures
An income statement's “bottom line” purpose is to show net income for an entity, and items which comprises net income. The final result is “Net Profit (Loss) for the Period Transferred to Equity”. The most important element of the structure of the Income Statement is Profit (Loss) after Tax (pls.atx). This element is comprised in turn of three elements:
The element Total Profit (Loss) after Tax (pls.atx.ttt) in turn has a set of disclosures to represent profits by function (e.g. Total Marketing and Distribution Costs (exp.mkg.dcs.ttt)) or by nature (e.g. Total Raw Materials and Consumables Used (flw.rwm.ttt)).
The structure of the Cash Flow disclosures is closely modeled on the disclosures required in IAS 7. Support provided is provided for both the direct and indirect method. There is a “same as” link between the Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of the Period in the Cash Flow section of the taxonomy (ast.cce.end) and the equivalent tag in the Balance Sheet (ast.cur.cce). The structure of the Cash Flow disclosures is shown in Figure 8:
Figure 8: Cash Flow Structure
Figure 9: Structure of Statement of Changes in Equity
For each of the sections, with the exception of Total Changes in Equity, model the opening balance, changes and closing balance. The structure of these sub-sections is typified by the elements for disclosures in changes in Share Capital at Par, shown in Figure 10:
Figure 10: Changes in Share Capital at Par
The element “Total Changes in Equity” (eqy.ttt.end) is made up of changes not recognized in the Income Statement (eqy.flw.urz.ttt.net) and changes in in the beginning balance of equity (eqy.beg.ttt.net). This relationship is shown in Figure 11:
Figure 11: Total Changes in Equity Structure
Often it is necessary to create two XBRL elements for the same concept to to display it in different sections of the taxonomy without creating a problem of double counting in the calculation linkbase. For example, the details of classes of Property, Plant and Equipment appear separately in the Explanatory Disclosure and Accounting Policies (EDAP) Taxonomy from their parent element “Property Plant and Equipment” in this PFS Taxonomy. These elements are labeled in the description field with the “same as” label.
The “same as” concept is part of XBRL Specification Version 2.0, and its interpretation is as follows: there will be an error if an instance document having two elements linked by a “same as” definition relationship and which have the same numeric context have different content values.
Namespaces are an XML concept. XBRL, using XML Schema 1.0, uses XML namespaces in its schemas and instance documents. The purpose of a namespace, in the context of XBRL is to identify the taxonomy of any particular XML element. Using namespaces removes any ambiguity or confusion that may arise as a result of elements from different taxonomies sharing the same element name.
For example, the PFS Taxonomy uses the composite name “ast.cce” to represent “cash and cash equivalents”. If the United Kingdom creates an XBRL taxonomy that also uses “ast.cce”, there needs to be a “differentiating” mechanism. Using qualified namespaces – the XML way to say “required” – namespaces, the PFS Taxonomy “cash and cash equivalents” becomes iascf-pfs:ast.cce and the United Kingdom’s would be uk:ast.cce. The namespace simply adds a contextual prefix to any given XML element.
The namespaces relevant to this PFS Taxonomy are:
· xbrl-gcd, XBRL Global Common Document
· iascf-pfs, IAS Primary Financial Statements
· iascf-edap, Explanatory Disclosure and Accounting Policies
Figure 12 describes how weights have been incorporated into the PFS Taxonomy and how corresponding values will be entered into an instance document: (note that the term “natural balance” is not used, this is intentional)
Figure 12: Numeric Values and Weights
Typical Balance |
Weight |
Enter * |
|
Asset |
Debit |
1 |
Positive |
Liability & Equity |
Credit |
1 |
Positive |
Revenue |
Credit |
1 |
Positive |
Expense |
Debit |
1 |
Negative |
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expenses) |
Credit |
1 |
Positive or (Negative) |
|
|
|
|
Cash Inflows |
Debit |
1 |
Positive |
Cash Outflows |
Credit |
1 |
Negative |
|
|
|
|
Number of Employees |
N/A |
0 |
Positive |
· Enter means enter into an instance document.
This section explains the naming conventions created and used in the PFS Taxonomy to associate digital “tags” to concepts from the IASB Standards and other related materials. The purpose of this “digital translation” is to provide a consistent and reliable way for relevant parties to use and integrate the Standards into their software applications.
The following terms are used throughout this section:
· Component: A three-character representation of a fact that relates to the Standards. This fact may represent, among other things, an accounting term, an accounting concept, or an IAS-defined definition. Examples: [ast] = “asset”; [exy] = “extraordinary”.
· Composite: A series of two or more components. A composite represents a more specific concept than a component. Also referred to as a composite element name. Examples: [inx.fna.cto] = “Income (Expense) from Financing Activities Continuing Operations”; [pls.npl] = “Net Profit (Loss) for the Period Transferred to Equity”.
· Reference: A reference to literature that supports the existence and necessity of a component and/or composite. Each component and composite has at least one reference. Typically these refer to chapter/subchapter/paragraphs/etc., as denoted in the IAS Bound Volume. However, other references may also be present
· Label: A label is text that describes a component and/or composite to a user. A single component or composite may have multiple labels, typically one per language, although a single language may have multiple types of labels.
· Extended Component: A component that occurs so infrequently that it too insignificant to be considered a [regular] component. An extended component is represented by a number, must always be accompanied by ordinary components, and must never be the first component in a composite.
· XBRL: Extensible Business Reporting Language is an XML language that has been designed to represent business information in an XML (digital) format. XBRL is used to define sets of element names; IASCF composite element names.
Composites have one overriding requirement: to represent uniquely and unambiguously, a type of financial reporting fact. This requirement ensures that computers and software can “understand” the data they are processing and storing. With this sole purpose, it would be enough simply to supply each fact with a unique identifier and then keep a repository that matches each identifier with its references and labels.
PFS Taxonomy composite element names go beyond this minimal requirement of uniqueness. The PFS Taxonomy uses composite names and these names follow a pattern that, while of not sufficient rigor and consistency that the names can be decomposed and interpreted by software, it is nevertheless structured well enough to assist humans who must do taxonomy maintenance with a hint as to the meaning of each concept. Composite names are like the lines, arrows and other indicators painted on an airplane fuselage: the plane flies just as well without them, but the maintenance engineers can do their work more efficiently because they can quickly spot what they are looking for.
The PFS Taxonomy composite element names are XML-compliant element names. As such, each begins with a letter and is void of spaces and other XML Schema-prohibited characters. Composites are made up of two or more components, including extended components. Each component in a composite is separated with a ‘dot’ [ . ] The intent of ‘dot’ is to facilitate searching and scanning. Although computers may or may not be able to make sense out of a composite element name, a human can, provided the naming convention follows rules.
The goal of each composite element name is to contain a small number of components that define major distinctions. If the composite element has too many components and too much detail, the additional detail adds little value – it is better to just use an extended component, so as to ensure uniqueness.
The order in which components in a composite element name are combined should not be interpreted as a hierarchy. Although some composite element names may “appear” to resemble this relationship, it is strictly coincidence and unintentional. All components in a composite element name are equal in stature, i.e., there is no implied hierarchy within the composite element name. The hierarchy is expressed in the XBRL linkbases.
For example, the composite element name [pls.npl], which is linked to the English label “Net Profit (Loss) Transferred to Income”, does not include the component that represents “Income Statement” [ist]. This is because [pls.npl] completely and sufficiently represent the fact “Net Profit (Loss) Transferred to Income”. In addition to being associated with “Income Statement” [ist], [pls.npl] is also associated with “Statement of Changes in Equity” [cne], and “Statement of Cash Flows” [cfs].
Nearly all PFS Taxonomy composite element names contain a component that represents one of the concepts outlined in the IAS Framework, IAS 7 and IAS 8: Position (asset, liability, equity), performance (income, expense, profit or loss), or cash flow (flow).
There are exceptions to this general rule. One such example is when a fact that can be either income or expense depending on circumstances represented by the instance document where it is used. In this example, a third ‘state’ – income or expense – exists. The composite [inx.dsp.dto] represents “Gain (Loss) on Disposal of Discontinuing Operation”, which can be either an income or an expense.
The primary components are the “commonly reused” components. There are two types of primary components: a) prefix, and b) suffix.
Prefix components are the “building blocks” of every PFS Taxonomy composite element name. Every composite name must contain at least one prefix component. Essentially, every possible financial disclosure is a refinement of one of the prefix components. Prefix components usually (but do not have to) appear first in a composite element name. These components typically fall into one of four categories:
1.
Position: These
are: a) asset, b) liability, c) equity, and d) asset or liability. These are
essentially, the “real” accounts. When one of these four components is present,
none of the other three will be present. They are mutuall exclusive.
Typically, the prefix position components are followed immediately by more
descriptive position element, such as “cash” or “payables”, although, in the
case of assets and liabilities, a “current/non-current” component may be
inserted between, if such designations are used. In addition, when summary
accounts (e.g., total assets) are present, the prefix position element may not
be accompanied by a more descriptive position element.
2.
Performance:
These are a) income, b) expense, c) income or expense, d) profit or loss. These
are essentially the “nominal” accounts. When one of these four components is
present, none of the other three will be present. They too are mutually
exclusive.
Income and expense [inx] is used to represent unknown future values, as
mentioned in Detailed Considerations,
and also “gains and losses”, as there is no gain/loss component (as IAS
Framework considers gains and losses to be income and expenses, respectively).
3. Stand-alone Components: These are essentially groupings of position, performance and other elements. The include the a) income statement, b) balance sheet c) statement of cash flows, d) statement of changes in equity, e) statement of recognized gains and losses, and f) notes and disclosures. These composite elements are also components (by themselves) in that they are each fully represented by only one component.
4. General Prefix Components: These include a) cash flows, b) change (in) and, c) disclosures.
Position and performance components will not appear together in a composite name. However, both position and performance elements may appear with the general prefix components.
The suffix components are of two basic types that can broadly be categorized as either “flows” or “adjectives”. Flow components typically represent changes in position elements. The “adjective” components (general suffix components) typically describe the state of a composite element. The “other” [otr] suffix component is always last in a composite name when used and simply represents the catchall term “other.”
None at this time.
This taxonomy will be updated with revisions for errors and new features within the following guidelines:
· Since financial statements created using a taxonomy must be available indefinitely, the taxonomy must be available indefinitely. All updates will take the form of new versions of the taxonomy with a different date. For example, the taxonomy http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2002-04-20/iascf-ci-pfs-2002-04-20.xsd will never change. New versions will be issued under a different name, such as “http://www.xbrl.org/taxonomy/int/iascf/gaap/ci/pfs/2003-12-31/iascf-ci-pfs-2003-12-31.xsd”. This will ensure that any taxonomy created will be available indefinitely.
The following information relating to this taxonomy will be accumulated:
If you wish to report an error or require a clarification, please provide feedback as indicated in the “Comments and Feedback” section of this document.
Comments and feedback are welcome, particularly ideas to improve this taxonomy. If you have a comment or feedback or wish to report an error, post comments to:
xbrlfeedback@iasb.org.uk (mailto:xbrlfeedback@iasb.org.uk)
A tremendous effort has gone into creating this piece of intellectual property that is being placed in the public domain by the IASCF and XBRL International for use and benefit of all. The IASCF and members of XBRL International believe that this cooperative effort will benefit all participants in the financial information supply chain.
The IASCF and XBRL International would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals for their work in the creation of this taxonomy, and to their organizations that provided funds and time for their participation in this effort:
Name |
Organization |
Accounting Jurisdiction |
Alastair Boult |
Audit New Zealand |
New Zealand |
Roger Debreceny |
Nanyang Technological University |
Singapore |
Kersten Droste |
PricewaterhouseCoopers |
Germany |
Thomas Egan |
Deloitte and Touche |
Singapore |
Dave Garbutt |
FRS |
South Africa |
Preetisura Gupta |
PricewaterhouseCoopers |
Singapore |
David Hardidige |
Ernst and Young |
Australia |
David Huxtable |
KPMG |
Australia |
Walter Hamscher |
Standard Advantage |
US |
Charles Hoffman |
XSI |
US |
Josef Macdonald |
Ernst and Young |
New Zealand |
Ong Suat Ling |
Andersen |
Singapore |
Paul Phenix |
Australian Stock Exchange |
Australia |
Kurt Ramin |
IASB |
IAS |
David Prather |
IASB |
IAS |
Julie Santoro |
KPMG |
IAS |
Mark Schnitzer |
Morgan Stanley |
US |
Geoff Shuetrim |
KPMG |
Australia |
Bruno Tesniere |
PricewaterhouseCoopers |
Belgium |
Stephen Taylor |
Deloitte and Touche |
Hong Kong |
Jan Wentzel |
PricewaterhouseCoopers |
South Africa |
Charles Yeo |
Ernst and Young |
Singapore |
The following is a listing of members of XBRL International as of March 3, 2002:
ACCPAC International, Inc.; ACL Services Ltd.; Advisor Technology Services, LLC; American Institute of CPAs; Andersen; ANZ Bank; Asia Securities Printing; Anthem Software; Audicon; Australian and New Zealand Banking Group, Ltd; Australian Prudential Regulation Authority; Australia and New Zealand Banking Group; Australian Stock Exchange; Bank of America, BDO Seidman, LLP; Beacon IT; Best Software; Bowne & Co., Inc.; Bridge Information Systems; Bryant College; Business Wire; California State University, Northridge; Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants; CaseWare International Inc.; Certified General Accountants of Canada Association of Canada; Cogniant, Inc.; Council of Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants (NIVRA); Count-net.com SA; CPA Australia; CPA2Biz; Crowe, Chizek and Company, LLP; Creative Solutions; DATEV e.G.; Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS); Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu; Deutsche Bank AG; Deutsche Börse AG; Deutsche Bundesbank; Deutsche Vereinigung für Finanzanalyse und Asset Management; Diva Software; Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein; DRSC; EDGAR Online, Inc.; eKeeper.com; eLedger.com, Inc.; Elemental Interactive; e-Numerate Solutions Incorporated; ePace! Software; ePartners, Inc.; Epicor Software Corporation; Ernst & Young; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Fidelity Investments; Financial Reporting Solutions (Pty) Ltd.; Financial Software Group; FinArch; FRx Software Corporation; Fujitsu; Gcom2 Solutions; General Electric Company; Global Filings, Inc.; Grant Thornton LLP; Haarmann, Hemmelrath & Partner; Hitachi; Hitachi System and Services; HOLT Value Associates; Hong Kong Society of Accountants; Hyperion Solutions Corp.; IBM; IBMatrix; IDW; I-Lumen, Inc.; Information Management Australia Pty Ltd; Infoteria Corporation; InnoData GmbH; Innovision Corporation; Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer; Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia; Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales; Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland; Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Singapore; Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand; Institute of Management Accountants; International Accounting Standards Board; International Federation of Accountants J.P. Morgan Chase; Japan Digital Disclosure Inc.; Japan Notary Organization; JISA (Japan Information Service Industry Assn); KPMG; KPMG Consulting; Lawson Software; Microsoft Corporation; Microsoft Great Plains Software, Inc.; MIP, Inc.;MIS Deutschland GmbH; Moody's Risk Management Services, Inc.; Morgan Stanley; Multex.com, Inc.; National Center of Charitable Statistics (NCCS); National Information Infrastructure Enterprise Promotion Association (Taiwan); Navision; NEC Planning Research, Inc. (Japan); NetLedger, Inc.; New River, Inc.; Newtec; Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc.; Oinke, Inc.; PCA Software; PeopleSoft, Inc.; PPA GmbH; Practitioners Publishing Company; PricewaterhouseCoopers; R.R. Donnelley Financial; Reuters Group LP; RIA; Sage Software; SAP AG; Seattle Pacific University Center for Professional Development; Software AG; Standard and Poor's; Syspro; Takara Printing; Teikoku Data Bank; The Woodburn Group; Thomson Financial; Tokyo Shoko Research; U.S. Census Bureau; XBRL Solutions, Inc.
Prefix components are typically (but do not have to be) the first component in a composite element name.
Component |
Component Label |
Rule |
ast |
asset |
Always first when expressing a numeric position value |
eqy |
equity |
|
lia |
liability |
|
aol |
asset or liability |
Component |
Component Label |
Rule |
exp |
expense |
Always first when expressing a numeric performance value |
inc |
income |
|
inx |
income or expense |
|
pls |
profit or loss |
Stand-alone components are groupings for other composites. XBRL uses xLink to associate composite element names with stand-alone components.
Component |
Component Label |
Rule |
bst |
balance sheet |
Stand-alone component. All are containers for groups of other composites |
cfs |
cash flow statement |
|
cne |
changes in net equity (statement of) |
|
ist |
income statement |
|
rgl |
recognized gains and losses (statement of) |
|
nds |
notes and disclosures |
Component |
Component Label |
Rule |
dcl |
disclosure |
Always first when used; can be used with any other elements |
cfl |
cash flow |
Always first when expressing a numeric item. Used in XBRL. |
chg |
change [in] |
Applies to position elements and precedes position elements. When used in XBRL, typically follows the [cfl] component. |
Suffix components are typically (but do not have to be) the last component in a composite element name and are commonly exist with other suffix components.
Component |
Component Label |
Rule |
flw |
flow |
Typically the last component unless any “general suffix components” are present, in which case the flow components will precede any “general suffix components”. If one of these three suffix components is present in a composite name, neither of the other two will be present. |
ifl |
inflow |
|
ofl |
outflow |
Component |
Description |
|
net |
Label |
net change, net amount |
Rule |
Last unless [otr] present. |
|
Context |
Summarizes composite elements. Always used for summary components except: 1) for “Profit (Loss)” summaries, in which case [pls] is used |
|
Example |
[ast-cur-net] = Current Assets (net) |
Component |
Description |
|
end |
Label |
ending, conclusion |
Rule |
Last unless [net], [otr] or [xtl] are present, in which it precedes these |
|
Context |
Applies to amounts that represent an ending balance for a specific reporting period. Only position elements may contain the [end] component |
|
Example |
[ast-cce-end] = Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
Component |
Description |
|
beg |
Label |
beginning, start |
Rule |
Last unless [net], [otr] or [xtl] are present, in which it precedes them. |
|
Context |
Applies to amounts that represent a beginning balance for a specific reporting period (e.g., from 2002-01-01 to 2002-12-31) versus the ending balance of another period (2001-12-31). Only position elements may contain the [beg] component |
|
Example |
[eqy-rrv-beg-net] = Revaluation Reserves Beginning Balance (net) |
Component |
Description |
|
xtl |
Label |
total |
Rule |
Last unless [net] or [otr] or both are present, in which it precedes either or both |
|
Context |
Used to express Y-axis totals in XBRL |
|
Example |
[inc-rev-xtl] = Total Revenue; [eqy-beg-xtl-net] = Total Changes in Equity Beginning Balance |
Component |
Description |
|
adj |
Label |
adjustment, adjusting (event) |
|
Rule |
Typically follows [rsm] or [cim] |
|
Context |
1) Can represent capital maintenance adjustments (increases or decreases) to equity. Often used with [rvl] and [rsm] 2) Can represent a non-cash adjustment |
|
Example |
[eqy-adj-hgr-rsm-beg] = Hedging reserves restatement of beginning balance; [cfl-cim-adj-dep] = Depreciation relating to cash flows from operating activities |
Component |
Description |
|
otr |
Label |
other |
|
Rule |
Always last |
|
Context |
Represents any “other” designation. Only one [otr] per composite element name |
|
Example |
[cfl-iva-otr] = Other Cash Flows from (used in) Investing Activities |
Complete Component List (As of 2002-04-20)
Key |
Component |
Component Label |
144 |
aat |
allowed alternative treatment |
231 |
aaz |
accumulated amortization |
3 |
acq |
acquisition |
6 |
acs |
administrative cost |
5 |
add |
addition |
151 |
adj |
adjustment, adjusting (event) |
2 |
adp |
accumulated depreciation |
156 |
adv |
advance |
11 |
afs |
available for sale (financial asset) |
227 |
aga |
agricultural activity |
228 |
agp |
agricultural produce |
232 |
ail |
accumulated impairment loss |
211 |
amk |
active market (for trading assets) |
8 |
amt |
amount |
7 |
amz |
amortization |
285 |
aol |
asset or liability |
4 |
apc |
additional paid-in capital |
253 |
apl |
accumulated profit or loss |
1 |
apy |
accounting policy |
10 |
asc |
associate |
9 |
ast |
asset |
257 |
atx |
after tax |
239 |
bas |
basis of; basis used to |
14 |
bcs |
borrowing cost |
13 |
beg |
beginning, start |
229 |
bia |
biological asset |
143 |
bmt |
benchmark treatment |
244 |
brw |
borrowing(s) |
166 |
bsg |
business segment |
12 |
bst |
balance sheet |
258 |
btx |
before tax, pre-tax |
15 |
bzc |
business combinations |
16 |
bzd |
business divestiture |
22 |
cae |
change in accounting estimate |
23 |
cap |
change in accounting policy |
217 |
cas |
contingent asset |
20 |
cce |
cash and cash equivalents |
189 |
ccs |
current service cost (of defined benefit obligation) |
271 |
cdm |
cash flow reconciliation for operating activities, direct method |
208 |
cdp |
cost of disposal (of an asset) |
279 |
cfi |
compound financial instrument |
21 |
cfl |
cash flow |
138 |
cfs |
cash flow statement |
32 |
cgs |
cost of goods sold |
274 |
chg |
change, change in |
272 |
cim |
cash flow reconciliation for operating activities, indirect method |
216 |
cli |
contingent liability |
25 |
cls |
class, classification |
24 |
cne |
changes in net equity (statement of) |
199 |
cnt |
control (corporate governance) |
266 |
cnv |
converted, convertible |
215 |
cob |
constructive obligation |
26 |
col |
collateralize (pledge as security) |
149 |
cpc |
cost plus [construction] contract |
17 |
cpl |
capital reserves |
27 |
cps |
common (ordinary) earnings per share |
196 |
cpz |
capitalized (capitalization of) |
28 |
csc |
construction contract |
19 |
csh |
cash |
198 |
csm |
cost method (accounting for investments) |
31 |
cst |
cost |
163 |
cta |
current tax asset |
29 |
ctg |
contingency |
160 |
ctl |
current tax liability |
30 |
cto |
continuing operation |
33 |
cur |
current |
282 |
cus |
customer |
18 |
cya |
carrying amount |
36 |
dbp |
defined [employee] benefit plan |
42 |
dcl |
disclosure |
37 |
dcp |
defined [employee] contribution plan |
35 |
dcr |
decrease |
45 |
dcs |
distribution cost |
38 |
dep |
depreciation |
243 |
dic |
deferred income |
278 |
din |
debt instrument |
209 |
dmt |
depreciable amount (of an asset) |
41 |
dps |
diluted earnings per share |
212 |
drt |
discount rate |
39 |
drv |
derivative |
40 |
dsc |
description |
44 |
dsp |
disposal |
161 |
dta |
deferred tax asset |
162 |
dtd |
deductible temporary [tax] difference |
34 |
dte |
date |
159 |
dtl |
deferred tax liability |
43 |
dto |
discontinuing operation |
154 |
dvd |
dividend |
46 |
dvs |
dividends per share |
150 |
ebd |
event after the balance sheet date |
50 |
ebf |
employee benefit |
49 |
ebp |
employee benefit plan |
53 |
ecp |
equity compensation plan |
220 |
eim |
effective interest method |
221 |
eir |
effective interest rate |
48 |
emb |
embedded (derivative) |
280 |
emp |
employee |
51 |
end |
ending, conclusion |
47 |
eps |
earnings per share |
188 |
eqb |
equity compensation benefit |
200 |
eqi |
equity [financial] instrument |
197 |
eqm |
equity method (accounting for investments) |
52 |
eqy |
equity |
146 |
evt |
event (and circumstances) |
256 |
exi |
extraordinary item |
54 |
exp |
expense |
191 |
exr |
exchange rate (currency) |
284 |
ext |
extended component (future use) |
55 |
exy |
extraordinary |
65 |
fae |
fixtures and equipment |
57 |
fcs |
finance cost |
68 |
fde |
fundamental error |
59 |
fia |
financial asset |
61 |
fil |
financial liability |
60 |
fin |
financial instrument |
58 |
fls |
finance lease |
249 |
flw |
flow (inflow or outflow) |
64 |
fna |
financing activity |
264 |
fng |
finished goods |
67 |
fop |
foreign operation |
148 |
fpc |
fixed price [construction] contract |
62 |
frv |
financial review |
63 |
fst |
financial statement |
260 |
fun |
function |
56 |
fvl |
fair value |
66 |
fxm |
foreign exchange movement |
252 |
fxr |
foreign exchange translation reserve |
153 |
gcn |
going concern |
179 |
gds |
goods |
70 |
gdw |
goodwill |
71 |
ggr |
government grant |
69 |
gle |
gain(s) and loss(es) recognized in equity |
72 |
gpt |
gross profit |
167 |
gsg |
geographical (business) segment |
287 |
gur |
guaranteed |
222 |
hdg |
hedge |
223 |
hfi |
hedging [financial] instrument |
251 |
hgr |
hedging reserve |
230 |
hrv |
harvest (of biological asset) |
240 |
hsc |
historical cost |
73 |
htm |
held-to-maturity [financial asset] |
74 |
hyp |
hyperinflationary |
241 |
ibr |
interest bearing |
277 |
ica |
internally constructed (generated) asset |
75 |
icp |
IAS common practice(s) |
79 |
icr |
increase |
80 |
ids |
initial disclosure |
247 |
ifl |
inflow |
205 |
ifp |
interim financial report (statement) |
76 |
imp |
impairment |
77 |
inc |
income |
81 |
int |
intangible asset |
82 |
inv |
inventory |
246 |
inx |
income or expense |
204 |
ipd |
interim financial reporting period |
176 |
ipl |
impairment loss |
86 |
isc |
issued capital |
78 |
ist |
income statement |
181 |
itt |
interest |
83 |
iva |
investing activity |
85 |
ivm |
investment |
84 |
ivp |
investment property |
87 |
jce |
jointly-controlled entity (joint venture) |
88 |
lab |
land and buildings |
147 |
lcm |
lower of cost or net realisable value |
90 |
lee |
lessee |
92 |
lia |
liability |
214 |
lob |
legal obligation |
91 |
lor |
lessor |
93 |
los |
loss |
89 |
lse |
lease |
186 |
mep |
multi-employer [defined contribution] plan |
261 |
mkg |
marketing (costs) |
94 |
mni |
minority interests |
193 |
mon |
monetary (asset or liability) |
95 |
mov |
movement(s) |
155 |
mtd |
method (of determination) |
152 |
naj |
non-adjusting (event) |
97 |
nas |
net assets |
96 |
nat |
nature |
101 |
ncr |
non-current |
100 |
nct |
non-cash transactions |
290 |
nds |
notes and disclosures |
195 |
neg |
negative goodwill |
270 |
net |
net change, net amount |
98 |
ney |
net equity |
242 |
nib |
non-interest bearing |
291 |
noc |
net of cash |
99 |
npl |
net profit or loss |
142 |
nrv |
net realisable value |
207 |
nsp |
net selling price (of an asset) |
213 |
oev |
obligating event |
248 |
ofl |
outflow |
104 |
ols |
operating lease |
218 |
onc |
onerous contract |
226 |
oop |
owner-occupied property |
102 |
ops |
operating (activities), operation |
202 |
opt |
option (share) |
105 |
ord |
ordinary |
106 |
org |
originated [financial asset from the enterprise] |
107 |
otr |
other |
110 |
pam |
plant and machinery |
194 |
par |
parent (company) |
108 |
pay |
payable |
111 |
pbs |
post balance sheet [events] |
184 |
peb |
post-employment benefit |
114 |
pls |
profit or loss |
113 |
poa |
profit (loss) from operating activities |
203 |
pos |
potential ordinary (common) share |
112 |
ppd |
prepaid (expense) |
115 |
ppe |
property, plant and equipment |
109 |
prd |
period |
269 |
prp |
prior period |
116 |
prv |
provision |
190 |
psc |
past service cost (of defined benefit obligation) |
225 |
rag |
repurchase agreement |
262 |
rdc |
research and development cost |
117 |
rec |
receivable |
267 |
red |
reduce, subtract |
119 |
rel |
related party |
120 |
res |
reserve |
157 |
ret |
retention |
122 |
rev |
revenue |
254 |
rgl |
recognized gains and losses (statement of) |
118 |
rgz |
recognized |
275 |
rlz |
realized |
206 |
rmt |
recoverable amount (of an asset) |
182 |
roy |
royalty |
237 |
rrv |
revaluation reserve |
268 |
rsm |
restatement |
219 |
rst |
restructuring |
174 |
rsv |
residual value (of an asset) |
178 |
rtr |
retirement (of an asset) |
236 |
rvd |
revaluation decrease |
235 |
rvi |
revaluation increase |
121 |
rvl |
revalued, revaluation |
123 |
rvs |
reversed, reversal |
263 |
rwm |
raw materials |
173 |
sap |
segment accounting policy |
171 |
sas |
segment asset |
250 |
scp |
share capital |
224 |
scr |
securitization (of financial asset) |
127 |
scs |
staff cost |
128 |
sds |
subsequent disclosure |
183 |
seb |
short-term employee benefits |
124 |
seg |
segment |
125 |
shr |
share |
140 |
sif |
significant influence |
126 |
sig |
significant (disclosure) |
172 |
sli |
segment liability |
170 |
srt |
segment result |
168 |
srv |
segment revenue |
158 |
stc |
stage of completion (of construction contracts and/or services) |
129 |
sub |
subsidiary |
177 |
sux |
subsequent expenditure |
180 |
svs |
services |
169 |
sxp |
segment expense |
130 |
tax |
tax |
134 |
tfr |
transfer |
132 |
tmb |
termination benefit |
133 |
trd |
trading [financial asset] |
245 |
trp |
trade payable |
234 |
trr |
trade receivable |
238 |
trv |
translation reserve |
135 |
tsh |
treasury share |
131 |
ttd |
taxable temporary difference |
259 |
xtl |
total (XBRL) |
289 |
txb |
tax base |
288 |
ugr |
unguaranteed |
175 |
ulf |
useful life (of an asset) |
276 |
ulz |
unrealized |
136 |
und |
unearned (income) |
192 |
uni |
uniting of interests (business combination) |
255 |
urz |
unrecognized |
165 |
utc |
unused tax credit |
164 |
utl |
unused tax loss |
210 |
viu |
value in use (of an asset) |
281 |
vnd |
vendor, supplier |
201 |
war |
warrant (share) |
286 |
wav |
weighted average |
265 |
wip |
work in progress |
273 |
wkp |
working capital |
145 |
wtd |
write-down |