1 Goals

XBRL provides a set of standard data types that may appear in XBRL instances. These include those specified in [XBRL 2.1]. As XBRL applications emerge, new, non-standard data types having common and useful semantics are being proposed. The goal of the XBRL Data Type Registry (hereinafter "DTR") is to be a public, online data set that documents these non-standard data types and their usage. Additions and other changes to the DTR, like other XBRL International work products, will proceed through a series of steps whose goal is to maximise the utility and longevity of the new data types and the instances that use them. This process is documented in [DTR PROCESS 1.1].

1.1 Relationship to other work

This document describes a backwards-compatible revision of DTR Structure 1.0 [DTR STRUCTURE]. The format of the registry itself remains unchanged, but the information contained in it is now generated from structured metadata contained with the schema definitions for the types.

This document pertains to XBRL as defined in the XBRL Specification [XBRL 2.1].

1.2 Terminology

The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, in this specification, are to be interpreted as described in [IETF RFC 2119].

abstract element, bind, concept, concrete element, context, Discoverable Taxonomy Set (DTS), duplicate items, duplicate tuples, element, entity, equal, essence concept, fact, instance, item, least common ancestor, linkbase, period, taxonomy, tuple, unit, taxonomy schema, child, parent, sibling, grandparent, uncle, ancestor, XBRL instance, c-equal, p-equal, s-equal, u-equal, v-equal, x-equal, minimally conforming XBRL processor, fully conforming XBRL processor and any other terms not specifically defined elsewhere in this document but which are used and defined in the XBRL 2.1 specification. are as defined by [XBRL 2.1] .

1.3 Language

The official language of XBRL International's own work products is English and the preferred spelling convention is UK English.

All documentation supporting a registry entry MUST be provided in English, and MAY be provided in additional languages.

1.4 Document conventions

1.4.1 Typographic conventions

1.4.1.1 Definition notation

Definitions are highlighted with green text.

1.4.1.2 Footnote notation

Comments which are informative, but not essential to the understanding of the point at hand, are provided in footnotes. All footnotes are non-normative.

1.4.1.3 Element and attribute notation

When referring to a specific element, it will be identified by its namespace prefix and local name. For example, the root element of a versioning report would be referred to as <ver:report> .

Attributes are also identified by their local name and, where appropriate, their namespace prefix. Attributes are distinguished from elements by prefixing them by an @ symbol. Thus, @id refers to the attribute with the name id.

When referring to any attribute, so long as it has a specific namespace, the local name is replaced by an asterisk ( *). Thus, the notation @xml:* specifies any attribute in the namespace http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace.

1.4.2 Formatting conventions

The following highlighting is used for normative technical material in this document:

Text of the normative example.

The following highlighting is used for non-normative examples in this document:

Text of the non-normative example.

The following highlighting is used for non-normative examples of poor, discouraged or disallowed usage.

Text of the discouraged example.

2 Namespaces and namespace prefixes

Namespace prefixes [XML Names] will be used for elements and attributes in the form <ns:name> where ns is the namespace prefix and name is the local name. Throughout this specification, the mappings from namespace prefixes to actual namespaces is consistent with Table 1.

The prefix column in Table 1 is non-normative. The namespace URI column is normative.

Table 1: Namespaces and namespace prefixes

Prefix	Namespace URI
dtr	http://www.xbrl.org/2009/dtr
xsd	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema

3 Data Model

The data model of the DTR is a list of each data type definition augmented with additional indicators and information needed by developers. This information has a standard XML format referred to as the DTR index. The DTR index on the xbrl.org website, as described in Section 5.

The information in the data model is obtained the schema definitions for the types, as described in Section 4

Table 2: A DTR entry

Field	Type	Explanation	Example
Data Type Namespace	anyURI	This is the namespace of the data type being defined.	`http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/2017-07-04`
Data Type Name	NCName	This is the local name of the data type being defined. A data type in the registry MUST NOT have the same Data Type Name as any other type in the registry. A data type in the registry MUST NOT have different semantics to a data type with the same Data Type Name that has been published at REC status in an earlier version of the register. If different semantics are required, a different Data Type Name should be used.	`domainItemType`
Status	{CR, REC, PROPOSED, RR}	The XBRL International status of this data type. CR - Candidate Recommendation. A public draft of a new datatype. REC - Recommendation PROPOSED - Submitted but with no official status yet granted by XBRL International. This status is not used in published versions of the registry. RR - Rescinded Recommendation. This status is not used in published versions of the registry	`CR`
Authoritative Location	anyURI	URI of fragment in a schema where the definition resides.	`http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/2017-07-04.xsd#domainItemType`
Version Date	date	Effective date of this version of the data type; all versions of the same data type with earlier dates are effectively superseded.	`2017-07-04`
Requirements	XHTML mixed	A statement of the requirements that gave rise to this data type. Requirements in different languages are distinguished using the `@xml:lang` attribute and an ISO 639 language code [ISO].	`Requested by major taxonomy project`
Definition	XHTML mixed	The meaning of the data type described in the same way as if it were part of an XBRL Specification. Definitions in different languages are distinguished using the `@xml:lang` attribute and an ISO 639 language code [ISO] .	`The domain member item type indicates that an element is a domain member.`
Version of XBRL	token	The XBRL version for which this an extension. Note that a data type could be "promoted" into a standard data type in some future version of the specification.	`2.1`
Minimum Edition Date	date	The XBRL edition date and beyond for which this is an extension.	`2003-12-31`

4 Schema definitions

Definitions of types within the registry MUST include annotations in the schema, as described in this section. These annotations are included in an <xsd:annotation> element within the schema definition, and are used to populate the DTR. The table below documents the allowed elements, and their mapping to items in the data model Section 3.

Table 3: Schema annotations

Element	Data model mapping	Notes
`xsd:documentation`	Definition	This element MAY be repeated in different languages
`xsd:appinfo/dtr:type/dtr:status`	Status
`xsd:appinfo/dtr:type/dtr:requirement`	Requirement	This element MAY be repeated in different languages

4.1 Schema versions

With the exception of the initial release noted below, all data types within a given release of the registry MUST be contained within a single XML Schema, targetting a namespace that uniquely identifies the status and release date of the registry.

Earlier releases of the registry conforming to DTR Structure 1.0 [DTR STRUCTURE] and DTR Process 1.0 [DTR PROCESS] were split into multiple schemas, and used an unversioned namespace. The latest version of the registry under version 1.0 of these specifications is adopted as the initial version under this 1.1 specification, and is an exception to the requirement stated above.

5 Hosting on the XBRL.org website

The latest DTR index from the REC DTR release will be placed at a fixed location on the xbrl.org website and will be the file at the URL http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/dtr.xml. Each release will also be permanently archived in a subdirectory whose name contains the date on which it became effective (e.g. http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/2009-01-22/dtr.xml).

6 Status of Data Types in the DTR and Implications for Software

Software vendors are NOT obliged to implement support for any REC data type in order to continue to claim that they support the base specification.

Under DTR Process v1.1 [DTR PROCESS 1.1], changes to the DTR are grouped into public releases. This avoids having multiple versions of the same schema with different content, and is intended to ease the definition of conformance levels, as users can assert or require conformance with a particular release version, rather than a list of individual data types.

Appendix A Schema

This section contains XML files that form part of this specification. Each document has a standard Publication URL, at which the normative copy of the document is published. A non-normative copy of each document is included in this appendix for convenience.

All references to these documents made for the purposes of DTS Discovery MUST resolve to the Publication URL, after applying XML Base processing (where applicable) and resolving any relative URLs.

It should be noted that the path component of a URL is case-sensitive, and so must match exactly. Further, alternative hosts and schemes that happen to resolve to the same location are not considered equivalent and may not be used. See [URI] for more details on URL equivalence.

The requirement to reference documents by Publication URL does not prevent processors from substituting local copies of the documents for performance or other reasons.

A.1 dtr.xsd

The following is the XML schema corresponding to the data model described in Section 3.

The Publication URL for this schema is http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/dtr.xsd.

<xs:schema
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:dtr="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/dtr" targetNamespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/dtr" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

<xs:complexType name="DocumentationType" mixed="true">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

Definition of a type to contain mixed text and XHTML markup

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

<xs:complexContent mixed="true">

<xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">

<xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">

<xs:any namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" processContents="lax"/>

</xs:sequence>

<xs:anyAttribute namespace="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" processContents="lax"/>

</xs:restriction>

</xs:complexContent>

</xs:complexType>

<xs:group name="typeGroup">

<xs:sequence>

<xs:element ref="dtr:typeNamespace"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:typeName"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:status"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:versionDate"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:authoritativeHref"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:requirement" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:definition" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:versionOfXBRL"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:minimumEditionDate"/>

</xs:sequence>

</xs:group>

<xs:element name="dtr">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

Root element of the XBRL Data Type Registry

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

<xs:complexType>

<xs:sequence>

<xs:element name="types">

<xs:complexType>

<xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">

<xs:element name="type">

<xs:complexType>

<xs:group ref="dtr:typeGroup"/>

</xs:complexType>

</xs:element>

</xs:sequence>

</xs:complexType>

</xs:element>

</xs:sequence>

<xs:attribute name="version" type="xs:token"/>

</xs:complexType>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="typeNamespace" type="xs:anyURI">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

This is the namespace for type being defined.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="typeName" type="xs:NCName">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

This is the local name of the type being defined.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="status">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

The XBRL International status of this type. CR, REC, NIE, PROPOSED, ACK or RR.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

<xs:simpleType>

<xs:restriction base="xs:token">

<xs:enumeration value="CR"/>

<xs:enumeration value="REC"/>

<xs:enumeration value="NIE"/>

<xs:enumeration value="PROPOSED"/>

<xs:enumeration value="ACK"/>

<xs:enumeration value="RR"/>

</xs:restriction>

</xs:simpleType>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="versionDate" type="xs:date">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

Effective date of this version of the type; all versions of the same type with earlier dates are effectively superseded

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="versionOfXBRL" type="xs:token">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

The XBRL version for which this is an extension. In principle, a type could be "promoted" into a standard type in some future version of the specification.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="minimumEditionDate" type="xs:date">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

The XBRL edition date and beyond for which this is an extension.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="requirement" type="dtr:DocumentationType">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

A statement of the requirements that gave rise to this type. Requirements in different languages are distinguished using the xml:lang attribute.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="definition" type="dtr:DocumentationType">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

The meaning of the type described in the same way as if it were in the Specification. Definitions in different languages are distinguished using the xml:lang attribute.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="authoritativeHref">

<xs:annotation>

<xs:documentation>

The absolute URI where the schema definition of the type is found.

</xs:documentation>

</xs:annotation>

<xs:simpleType>

<xs:restriction base="xs:anyURI">

<xs:pattern value=".*#.*"/>

</xs:restriction>

</xs:simpleType>

</xs:element>

<xs:element name="typeAnnotation">

<xs:complexType>

<xs:sequence>

<xs:element ref="dtr:status"/>

<xs:element ref="dtr:requirement" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

</xs:sequence>

</xs:complexType>

</xs:element>

</xs:schema>

Appendix B Sample dtr document (non-normative)

The following is an example of a dtr (as defined by the schema in Appendix A above). It contains only a single entry to illustrate the definition of a data type.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<types>

<type>

http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/${VERSION}

</typeNamespace>

escapedItemType

</typeName>

REC

</status>

2018-01-17

</versionDate>

https://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/${VERSION}/types.xsd#escapedItemType

</authoritativeHref>

Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies.

</requirement>

escapedItemType specializes string. There is no constraint on whether the resulting unescaped content is well-formed or not; this base type is exists so that processors know what to do with the content. It is a suitable base type for a data type whose unescaped content must be valid HTML 4.0 (which is not XML).

</definition>

2.1

</versionOfXBRL>

2003-12-31

</minimumEditionDate>

</type>

</types>

</dtr>

Appendix C References

DTR PROCESS: XBRL International Inc.. "Data Type Registry - Process 1.0"
Hugh Wallis.
(See http://www.xbrl.org/Specification/dtr/REC-2011-02-22/dtr-process-REC-2011-02-22.html)
DTR PROCESS 1.1: XBRL International Inc.. "Data Type Registry - Process 1.1"
Paul Warren.
(See http://www.xbrl.org/Specification/dtr/REC-2011-02-22/dtr-process-REC-2011-02-22.html)
DTR STRUCTURE: XBRL International Inc. "Data Types Registry - Structure 1.0"
Hugh Wallis.
(See http://www.xbrl.org/Specification/dtr/REC-2011-02-22/dtr-REC-2011-02-22.html)
IETF RFC 2119: IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force). "RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"
Scott Bradner.
(See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt)
ISO: International Standards Organisation. " ISO 4217 Currency codes, ISO 639 Language codes, ISO 3166 Country codes, ISO 8601 international standard numeric date and time representations. "
(See http://www.iso.ch/)
URI: IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force). "RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax"
T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, and R. Fielding.
(See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986)
XBRL 2.1: XBRL International Inc.. "Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) 2.1 Includes Corrected Errata Up To 2013-02-20"
Phillip Engel, Walter Hamscher, Geoff Shuetrim, David vun Kannon, and Hugh Wallis.
(See http://www.xbrl.org/Specification/XBRL-2.1/REC-2003-12-31/XBRL-2.1-REC-2003-12-31+corrected-errata-2013-02-20.html)
XML Names: W3C (World Wide Web Consortium). "Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition)"
(See http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-xml-names-20091208)

Appendix D Intellectual property status (non-normative)

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to XBRL International or XBRL organizations, except as required to translate it into languages other than English. Members of XBRL International agree to grant certain licenses under the XBRL International Intellectual Property Policy (www.xbrl.org/legal).

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and XBRL INTERNATIONAL DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

The attention of users of this document is directed to the possibility that compliance with or adoption of XBRL International specifications may require use of an invention covered by patent rights. XBRL International shall not be responsible for identifying patents for which a license may be required by any XBRL International specification, or for conducting legal inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those patents that are brought to its attention. XBRL International specifications are prospective and advisory only. Prospective users are responsible for protecting themselves against liability for infringement of patents. XBRL International takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Members of XBRL International agree to grant certain licenses under the XBRL International Intellectual Property Policy (www.xbrl.org/legal).

Appendix E Acknowledgements (non-normative)

This document could not have been written without the contributions of many people.

Appendix F Document history (non-normative)

Date	Author	Details
04 July 2017	Paul Warren	v1.1, prescribing the format of schema type definitions.
11 October 2017	Paul Warren	Initial PWD of v1.1
17 January 2018	Paul Warren	CR of v1.1.

Appendix G Errata corrections in this document

This appendix contains a list of the errata that have been incorporated into this document. This represents all those errata corrections that have been approved by the XBRL International Link Role Registry Approval Manager up to and including 17 January 2018. Hyperlinks to relevant e-mail threads may only be followed by those who have access to the relevant mailing lists. Access to internal XBRL mailing lists is restricted to members of XBRL International Inc.

No errata have been incorporated into this document.

Data Type Registry - Structure 1.1

Candidate Recommendation 17 January 2018

Status

Abstract

Table of Contents

Appendices

Tables

Definitions

1 Goals

1.1 Relationship to other work

1.2 Terminology

1.3 Language

1.4 Document conventions

1.4.1 Typographic conventions

1.4.1.1 Definition notation

1.4.1.2 Footnote notation

1.4.1.3 Element and attribute notation

1.4.2 Formatting conventions

2 Namespaces and namespace prefixes

3 Data Model

4 Schema definitions

4.1 Schema versions

5 Hosting on the XBRL.org website

6 Status of Data Types in the DTR and Implications for Software

Appendix A Schema

A.1 dtr.xsd

Appendix B Sample dtr document (non-normative)

Appendix C References

Appendix D Intellectual property status (non-normative)

Appendix E Acknowledgements (non-normative)

Appendix F Document history (non-normative)

Appendix G Errata corrections in this document