Copyright ©2009 XBRL International Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Circulation of this Public Working Draft is unrestricted. This document is normative. Other documents may supersede this document. Recipients are invited to submit comments to formula-feedback@xbrl.org, and to submit notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and provide supporting documentation.
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Relationship to other work
1.3 Language independence
1.4 Terminology
1.5 Document conventions (non-normative)
1.6 Namespaces and namespace prefixes
1.7 XPath usage
2 Syntax
2.1 Instance resource element
2.2 Instance-variable relationships
2.3 Formula-instance relationships
2.4 Chaining by instance relationships
2.5 Variables-scope relationships
2.6 Chaining by variables-scope relationships
A Normative schema
B References
C Intellectual property status (non-normative)
D Acknowledgements (non-normative)
E Document history (non-normative)
F Errata corrections in this document
1 Namespaces and namespace prefixes
1 A = B + C with C = D + E as dependent formula
2 A = B + C with C = D + E as dependent formula
chaining by instance relationships
chaining by variables scope
formula-instance relationship
instance resource
instance-variable relationship
variables-scope relationship
The variable instances specification defines syntax for identification of instances as variable-set objects, so that multiple instances can be processed, and so that chaining by both instance relationships and variables-scope can be supported.
It provides relationships that allow variables to be bound explicitly to specified instances, and that allow formula results to be directed explicitly to a specified instance.
It provides a relationship that allows explicit declaration of in-scope variables from another variable set, forming the basis for both chained variable sets and tuple generation (see tuples specification).
Each instance is independent of the other; it may have a different DTS, or be an instance with some commonality of parts to other DTSes, but deemed independent of other instance DTSes.
This specification is a member of a suite of similar specifications that define specific types of criteria that can be used to select facts from one or more input XBRL instance. It enhances the fact selection capabilities of the XBRL Variables Specification [VARIABLES], the output production of the XBRL Formulas Specification, [FORMULA], and forms the basis for the tuple output production by the XBRL Formula Tuples Specification [FORMULATUPLES].
This specification depends upon the XBRL Specification [XBRL 2.1], and the XBRL Variables Specification [VARIABLES]. In the event of any conflicts between this specification and the specifications upon which it depends, this specification does not prevail.
The official language of XBRL International's own work products is English and the preferred spelling convention is UK English.
This specification is consistent with the definitions of any of the terms defined in specifications that it depends on.
Documentation conventions follow those set out in the XBRL Variables Specification [VARIABLES].
Namespace prefixes [XML NAMES] will be used
for elements and attributes in
the form ns:name
where ns
is the
namespace prefix and name
is the local name.
Throughout this specification, the mappings
from namespace prefixes to actual namespaces is consistent
with
Table
1.
The prefix column in Table 1 is non normative. The namespace URI column is normative.
Prefix | Namespace URI |
---|---|
instances
|
http://xbrl.org/2010/variable/instance
|
xbrlvarinste
|
http://xbrl.org/2010/filter/variable/instance/error
|
eg
|
http://example.com/
|
fn
|
http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions
|
link
|
http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase
|
xbrli
|
http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance
|
xfi
|
http://www.xbrl.org/2008/function/instance
|
xbrldi
|
http://xbrl.org/2006/xbrldi
|
xbrldt
|
http://xbrl.org/2005/xbrldt
|
xl
|
http://www.xbrl.org/2003/XLink
|
xlink
|
http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink
|
xs
|
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
|
xsi
|
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
|
gen
|
http://xbrl.org/2008/generic
|
variable
|
http://xbrl.org/2008/variable
|
iso4217
|
http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217
|
This specification only provides a textual declaration of syntax constraints when those constraints are not expressed by the normative schema supplied with this specification.
Explanations of elements and attributes are only supplied when explanations are not already provided in other specifications.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, a reference to a specific element MUST be read as a reference to that element or to any element in its substitution group.
An instance resource is declared by a
<instanaces:instance>
element.
The syntax for the
<instances:instance>
element
is defined by the normative schema supplied with this specification.
The instance resource of an input instance document represents the loaded
instance with its accompanying DTS, with a context element of its <xbrli:xbrl>
element. It is of type variable:parameter, so that the semantics of parameter also apply to
the instance resource. (The parameter type is always element(xbrli:xbrl), its nodes are
treated as validated PSVI typed nodes.)
Instances can be loaded and saved by a formula processor in a similar manner as a formula processor does for its usual source input instance (and formula output instances), this is left unspecified to be an implementation issue.
Fact and general variables that are bound to elements of an instance are isolated to that instance and the DTS of that instance.
xbrli:xbrl
element
if the respective DTS, such as may be supplied by using the instance resource's name as a variable
QName, or any relevant expression such as $var/ancestor::xbrli:xbrl
or
root(.)/xbrli:xbrl
.
Output instances that are produced by the formula element, source, and aspect rules, have the DTS of output instance determined by source elements (and their original input instance associated DTS). Intermixing output facts with source or aspect rules of incompatible input instance DTSes will lead to invalid output instances, and should be avoided by formula authors (but is not intended to be detected automatically).
An output instance produced by a formula element with no sources (e.g., all aspects created by explicit aspect rules) must have the output DTS corresponding to the implied (ordinary) input DTS as it would be in the absence of any use of features of this specification.
Processing order dependency is implied by instance-variable relationships that depend on facts produced by formulas with formula-instance relationships to the same instance for the same named variable, and by variables-scope relationships where expression terms of a variable-set that is a target of a variables-scope relationship reference variables of the source variable set.
An instance with the QName
<instances:standard-input-instance>
refers to the standard normal source input instance to a formula processor, and with the QName
<instances:standard-output-instance>
refers to the standard normal output instance for production of formula result items and result tuples.
An instance-variable relationship is a specific relationship
between an
<instances:instance>
and a factVariable
or a generalVariable expressed by an
XLink arc.
To declare an instance-variable relationship an XLink arc MUST:
http://xbrl.org/arcrole/2010/instance-variable
The arcrole value,
http://xbrl.org/arcrole/2010/instance-variable
,
is declared in the normative schema for messages.
Instance-variable relationships MUST be expressed by generic arcs as indicated by the restrictions imposed by the arcrole declaration in the normative schema.
An formula-instance relationship is a specific relationship
between a formula
and an
<instances:instance>
expressed by an
XLink arc.
To declare an formula-instance relationship an XLink arc MUST:
http://xbrl.org/arcrole/2010/formula-instance
The arcrole value,
http://xbrl.org/arcrole/2010/formula-instance
,
is declared in the normative schema for messages.
Formula-instance relationships MUST be expressed by generic arcs as indicated by the restrictions imposed by the arcrole declaration in the normative schema.
Chaining by instance relationships is a form of chaining, or staging result items of one formula, to be used as input terms by a subsequent formula, by explicit specification that the dependent terms are obtained as results from other formulas.
This form of chaining can only relate the fact item produced by one formula to an input term of a subsequent variable set. See below Chaining by variables scope for chaining by use of variable set in-scope variables visibility, which can also be used for tuples production. This form of chaining provides maximal isolation of the result-producing formula from the chained dependent value consuming formula.This example shows use of instance-variable and formula-instance relationships to relate two formulas, one producing a = b + c and the second producing c = d + e, to each other. The c = d + e formula produces its output fact item in an intermediate scratch-pad instance to be used by the dependant a = b + c formula. |
An variables-scope relationship is a specific relationship between two variable sets and an expressed by an XLink arc.
This relationship makes the in-scope variables of the relationship's source variable set visible as in-scope variables of the relationship's target variable-set.
If the source is
a formula, the optional @name
attribute allows associating an in-scope variable, with the
name specified by this attribute, to the
factVariable node of the source formula. The factVariable is deemed validated, it's value and aspects
all have the PSVI typed values.
If the source is
a variableAssertion, the optional @name
attribute allows associating an in-scope variable with the
name specified by this attribute, to the test expression of the source assertion. The test expression result
is deemed a boolean atomic value.
This can implement a form of chaining, and also is used to provide visibility to the location aspect of a parent tuple, to implement output of child factVariables, for tuples production (see tuples specification).
Any of the variables made in-scope by this relationship may have the same variable name as a variable of the target variable-set, in which case the variable of the target variable-set is accessible, and the like-named variable of the source variable-set is not available in the target variable-set.
To declare an variables-scope relationship an XLink arc MUST:
http://xbrl.org/arcrole/2010/variables-scope
The arcrole value,
http://xbrl.org/arcrole/2010/variables-scope
,
is declared in the normative schema for messages.
variables-scope relationships MUST
be expressed by
<instances:variables-scope-arc>
as indicated by the restrictions imposed by the arcrole declaration
in the normative schema.
Chaining by variables scope is a form of chaining, or staging in-scope variables and result items of one value assertion, formula, or consistency assertion, to be used as input terms by a subsequent formula, by explicit specification that the dependent variable set has in-scope access to the prior variable set's variables and produced formula fact.
This example shows use of variables-scope to relate two formulas, one producing a = b + c and the second producing c = d + e, to each other, with this relationship. The c = d + e formula produces its output fact item in the standard output instance, and makes it available as a named result of in-scope variables, to be used by the dependant a = b + c formula. |
The following is the XML schema provided as part of this specification. This is normative. Non-normative versions (which should be identical to these except for appropriate comments indicating their non-normative status) are also provided as separate files for convenience of users of the specification.
NOTE: (non-normative) Following the schema maintenance policy of XBRL International, it is the intent (but is not guaranteed) that the location of non-normative versions of these schemas on the web will be as follows:
http://www.xbrl.org/2008/
- during the drafting process for
this specification this directory should contain a copy of the
most recent published version of the schema at
http://www.xbrl.org/2010/variable/instance.xsd.
http://www.xbrl.org/2008/
. During the drafting process for
this specification this directory should contain a copy of the
most recent published version of the schema at
http://www.xbrl.org/2010/variable-instance.xsd.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to XBRL International or XBRL organizations, except as required to translate it into languages other than English. Members of XBRL International agree to grant certain licenses under the XBRL International Intellectual Property Policy (www.xbrl.org/legal).
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and XBRL INTERNATIONAL DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The attention of users of this document is directed to the possibility that compliance with or adoption of XBRL International specifications may require use of an invention covered by patent rights. XBRL International shall not be responsible for identifying patents for which a license may be required by any XBRL International specification, or for conducting legal inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those patents that are brought to its attention. XBRL International specifications are prospective and advisory only. Prospective users are responsible for protecting themselves against liability for infringement of patents. XBRL International takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Members of XBRL International agree to grant certain licenses under the XBRL International Intellectual Property Policy (www.xbrl.org/legal).
This document could not have been written without the contributions of many people including the participants in the Formula Working Group.
Date | Author | Details |
---|---|---|
13 December 2010 | Herm Fischer |
First internal working draft created, drawing extensively on wiki page discussions in 2008 and early 2009, discussions with Fujitsu team at Bank of Japan hosted meeting in early 2009, and initial UBmatrix implementation. |
This appendix contains a list of the errata that have been incorporated into this document. This represents all those errata corrections that have been approved by the XBRL International Formula Working Group up to and including 16 December 2009. Hyperlinks to relevant e-mail threads may only be followed by those who have access to the relevant mailing lists. Access to internal XBRL mailing lists is restricted to members of XBRL International Inc.
No errata have been incorporated into this document.