Login

Items tagged with "Inline XBRL"

SEC completes transition to Inline XBRL

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has made the final step in its transition from (traditional) XBRL to Inline XBRL, with smaller companies now joining the fold.

Read more


ESEF Errors and Common Pitfalls: 7 – HTML formatting

This is part of a series on common errors and pitfalls in ESEF filings, observed in our analysis of hundreds of reports collected in our repository, at filings.xbrl.org. For the series introduction, start here. Inline XBRL embeds XBRL tags into an HTML document, resulting in a single document that enables filers to provide computer-readable data whilst retaining significant control […]

Read more


ESEF Errors and Common Pitfalls: 6 – Redundant Labels

This is part of a series on common errors and pitfalls in ESEF filings, observed in our analysis of hundreds of reports collected in our repository, at filings.xbrl.org. For the series introduction, start here. ESMA’s ESEF taxonomy contains taxonomy element labels in all official EU languages. ESEF reports are expected to use these ESMA taxonomy labels for base taxonomy […]

Read more


Incorrect dates: Another common ESEF issue

Dating problems don’t only plague those seeking the perfect partner – they can also cause angst for filers in pursuit of a flawless ESEF report! This week we bring you another post from XBRL International Guidance Manager Revathy Ramanan in her series on common errors in European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) filings and what to do about […]

Read more


Some thoughts on UKSEF from PwC

What is UKSEF, how does it relate to European standards, and should companies use it? The UK has its own Inline XBRL format and taxonomy, the UK Single Electronic Format (UKSEF), an analogue to the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).

Read more


ESEF Errors and Common Pitfalls: 5 – Incorrect Dates

This is part of a series on common errors and pitfalls in ESEF filings, observed in our analysis of hundreds of reports collected in our repository, at filings.xbrl.org. For the series introduction, start here. A common error in XBRL reports is tagging facts with the wrong date. This arises because of the different conventions that are typically used to […]

Read more


Netherlands offers a model for ESEF audit

How can we facilitate effective and efficient assurance of European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) filings, and make it possible for auditors to do their jobs without needing to understand the technical aspects of Inline XBRL?

Read more


Calculation inconsistencies and package errors: More common ESEF pitfalls

We bring you two new posts on ‘ESEF Errors and Common Pitfalls’ this week, from XBRL International’s Guidance Manager Revathy Ramanan.

Read more


The Dutch Model: A Method for the Audit of ESEF Filings

This is a guest post by Jacques Urlus, policy advisor IT & Audit at the Royal Netherlands Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA) and Vice Chair of our Dutch jurisdiction, XBRL NL. Based on his presentation at Data Amplified Virtual on 16 April 2021, he discusses his unique and groundbreaking work with the NBA on audit of […]

Read more


ESEF Errors and Common Pitfalls: 4 – Report Package Errors

This is part of a series on common errors and pitfalls in ESEF filings, observed in our analysis of hundreds of reports collected in our repository, at filings.xbrl.org. For the series introduction, start here. An ESEF report is made up of multiple files which must be submitted in a specially formatted ZIP file, known as […]

Read more



Newsletter
Newsletter

Would you like
to learn more?

Join our Newsletter mailing list to
stay plugged in to the latest
information about XBRL around the world.

By clicking submit you agree to the XBRL International privacy policy which can be found at xbrl.org/privacy